nsf statement of potential overlap

Conformance to the 15-page limit will be strictly enforced and may not be exceeded unless a deviation has been specifically authorized. General Current and Pending and Biosketch, The Common Rule defines research as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. The role of the selection panel is to provide advice on the selection of participants. (iii) Certification Regarding Flood Hazard Insurance[8]: Two sections of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 USC 4012a and 4106) bar Federal agencies from giving financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes in any area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having special flood hazards unless the: (1) community in which that area is located participates in the national flood insurance program; and. See Chapter IV.B for additional information. [16] According to the IRS, US territories and possessions are as follows: Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Midway Island, Wake Island, Palmyra Island, Howland Island, Johnston Island, Baker Island, Kingman Reef, Jarvis Island, and other US islands, cays, and reefs that are not part of the 50 States. It is the proposing organization's responsibility to assure that only properly authorized individuals perform this function.[7]. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the U.S.; use of science and technology to inform public policy; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education. Welcome to the new NSF website. When anticipated, the proposer must enter the names of countries and dates of visit on the proposal budget, if known. Proposers are strongly encouraged to use only a standard, single-column format for the text. The Richard A. and Susan F. Smith These are typically determined by application of a calculated fringe benefit rate for a particular class of employee (full time or part-time) applied to the salaries and wages requested. (iv) Certification Regarding Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research (RECR): Note: The requirement specified in Section 7009 of the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science (COMPETES) Act (42 USC 1862o1), as amended, to have a plan to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research to faculty and other senior personnel who will be supported by NSF to conduct research will go into effect for new proposals submitted or due on or after July 31, 2023. Proposals that contain letters of support not authorized by the program solicitation may be returned without review. While there is no established page limitation for the references, this section must include bibliographic citations only and must not be used to provide parenthetical information outside of the 15-page Project Description. Campus Center, Suite 836 [50] See Chapter IX.D. (v) In order for NSF to comply with Federal Environmental Statutes (including, but not limited to, the National Environmental Policy Act (42 USC 4321, et seq. Information on other support assists awarding agency staff in the identification and resolution of potential overlap of support. Such allowances must be reasonable, in conformance with the policy of the proposing organization and limited to the days of attendance at the conference plus the actual travel time required to reach the conference location. Submitting finalized Biosketch and Current and Pending Support to NSF. RAISE awards are not eligible for renewal. In the interim, proposers must continue to meet the guidance specified in PAPPG Chapter IX.B. The prospective PI will receive an email from the cognizant NSF program officer that specifies whether a full proposal may be submitted. Each proposal must contain a summary of the proposed project not more than one page in length. NSF, however, encourages the community to use SciENcv prior to the October 2023 implementation. Submission of a collaborative proposal from one organization, The single proposal method allows investigators from two or more organizations who have developed an integrated research project to submit a single, focused proposal. Travel outside the areas specified above is considered foreign travel. This section of the proposal is used to assess the adequacy of the resources available to perform the effort proposed to satisfy both the Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts review criteria. Synergistic activities must be specific and must not include multiple examples to further describe the activity. In some instances, Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. Note that registration fees under NSF-supported conferences are considered program income. Conference Services. If the dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided. To support additional personnel (e.g., a technician or research assistant) to sustain research while a postdoctoral researcher or graduate student being supported by NSF on the award is on family leave for either primary dependent care responsibilities or other direct family considerations. ), the proposer may be requested to submit supplemental post-proposal submission information to NSF in order that a reasonable and accurate assessment of environmental impacts by NSF may be made. Note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this Guide; EAGER proposals must otherwise be compliant with the proposal preparation requirements specified in Part I of the PAPPG. Expendable materials and supplies necessary for the meeting. In accordance with Section 223(a)(1) of theWilliam M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (42 USC 6605(a)(1)), senior personnel are required to certify in SciENcv that the information provided in their Current and Pending (Other) Support document is accurate, current, and complete. *In-Kind Contribution Start Date: Indicate the start date (MM/YYYY) of the in-kind contribution as proposed/approved. This information is used to manage reviewer selection. An international activity is defined as research, training, and/or education carried out in cooperation with international counterparts either overseas or in the U.S. using virtual technologies. Proposers may include a list of suggested reviewers (including email address and organizational affiliation) who they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. Such an activity may result in earning authorship on a publication describing or supporting a research activity, or any consulting activity that otherwise meets the definition of Research. This includes, but is not limited to, information related to current, pending, and other support (both foreign and domestic) as defined in 42 U.S.C. 3729-3733 and 3802. PIs are cautioned, however, that the text must still be readable. Such costs must be itemized and detailed in the budget justification. The recommendations of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF. False representations may be subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. The Project Summary should be informative to other persons working in the same or related fields, and, insofar as possible, understandable to a broad audience within the scientific domain. When the individual signs the certification on behalf of themselves, they are certifying that the information is current, accurate, and complete. In the meantime, for NSF proposals due on or after . If a decision is made to fund the proposal, the cognizant NSF Program Officer will notify the NSF Animal Welfare Officer to initiate negotiation of a PHS-approved Animal Welfare Assurance with OLAW. The Foundation encourages proposers to request funding for durations of three to five years when such durations are necessary for completion of the proposed work and are technically and managerially advantageous. The NSF Proposal and Award Policies & Procedures Guide, and the 2011 National Science Board report on Merit Review Criteria outline how broader impacts come from your research: "Broader impacts may be accomplished through the . Concept Outlines can be submitted either by email to a cognizant Program Officer or via the Program Suitability and Proposal Concept Tool (ProSPCT). The cost of computer services, including computer-based retrieval of scientific, technical, and educational information, may be requested only where it is institutional policy to charge such costs as direct charges. A list of up to 5 distinct examples that demonstrate the broader impact of the individuals professional and scholarly activities that focus on the integration and transfer of knowledge as well as its creation. This information is relied upon by NSF in formulating the total award amount and final award budget that is incorporated into any resultant award. NSF postdoctoral fellows who receive funding directly from NSF rather than through an organization are ineligible to receive CLB supplements. The near-field dynamics of a rectangular heated overexpanded jet of aspect ratio two is examined with an implicit large-eddy simulation using experimental data for validation purposes. Collecting their disclosure information from GMAS. The overview includes a description of the activity that would result if the proposal were funded and a statement of objectives and methods to be employed. Similarly, ramps, elevators, or other structural modifications of research facilities are not eligible for direct support under this program. (viii) Safe and Inclusive Working Environments for Off-Campus or Off-Site Research. Any costs proposed to an NSF project must be allowable, reasonable, and directly allocable to the supported activity. The policy or code-of-conduct must address the method for making a complaint as well as how any complaints received during the meeting will be resolved. brief statement of the overall objectives of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution must be provided; summary of the potential overlap . Rather, planning proposals are appropriate for the development of larger-scale proposals in specific areas in which NSF wishes to ensure a sufficiently robust competition in the future. See also Chapter II.D.2.f(xiii)(a) and 2 CFR 200.438. The results must be separately described under two distinct headings: Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts; (d) a listing of the publications resulting from the NSF award (a complete bibliographic citation for each publication must be provided either in this section or in the References Cited section of the proposal); if none, state No publications were produced under this award., (e) evidence of research products and their availability, including, but not limited to: data, publications, samples, physical collections, software, and models, as described in any Data Management Plan; and. This site contains RECR resources by discipline, provides links to published codes of ethics, as well as includes pages dedicated to resources produced or used by specific professional groups. Travel, meal, and hotel expenses of recipient employees who are not on travel status are unallowable. A justification based on the established computer service rates at the proposing organization must be included. The cognizant NSF Program Officer will make decisions regarding what constitutes appropriate support on a case-by-case basis. Line G.2. The project title will be preceded by the prefix EAGER:. The National Science Foundation has issued an updated Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG), effective October 4th, which includes changes to the NSF biosketch and current & pending support documents. This limit includes salary compensation received from all NSF-funded grants. Compensation classified as salary payments must be requested in the salaries and wages category. Concept Outlines can be submitted either by email to a cognizant Program Officer or via ProSPCT. Each proposal[38] that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers[39] must upload under "Mentoring Plan" in the supplementary documentation section of Research.gov, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals. See section (xii) below. In the specific case of computing devices, charging as a direct cost is allowable for devices that are essential and allocable, but not solely dedicated, to the performance of the NSF project. This field is limited to 1500 characters. Instructions for preparing an indirect cost rate proposal can be found on the NSF website. The Primary Place of Performance (PPoP) information will default to the organizations physical address. Where applicable, the box for Historic Places must be checked on the Cover Sheet. It must include clear statements as to why the proposed research is urgent and why RAPID is the most appropriate type of proposal for supporting the proposed work. If the project involves human subjects and is to be performed outside of the U.S., evidence of IRB approval is required. In the interim, proposers may continue to prepare and submit this document via use of SciENcv or the NSF fillable PDF. [36] Editorial board does not include Editorial Advisory Board, Scientific Editorial Board, or any other subcategory of Editorial Board. Conferences, including the facilities in which they are held, funded in whole or in part with NSF funds, must be accessible to participants with disabilities. *Overall Objectives: Provide a brief statement of the overall objectives of the in-kind contribution(s). [20] A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the proposing organization considers a contract. Most Center awards are limited to a maximum duration of ten years and are often subject to mid-course external merit review. The description should be narrative in nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information. By signing the Cover Sheet, the AOR is certifying that prior to the proposers participation in the meeting, the proposer will assure that the meeting organizer has a written policy or code-of-conduct that addresses sexual harassment, other forms of harassment, and sexual assault, and that includes clear and accessible means of reporting violations of the policy or code-of-conduct. The following provides a listing of the types of costs that are not allowable for inclusion on a conference budget: (i) Meals and Coffee Breaks for Intramural Meetings. *Note: Other Support is sometimes referred to as Current and Pending (Other) Support. for additional information. PIs will receive an email from the cognizant NSF program officer that specifies whether a full proposal may be submitted. Proposers are advised that the Data Management Plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation. In such cases, the costs must be classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training allowance method. Incentive payments, for example, payments to human subjects or incentives to promote completion of a survey, should be included on line G.6. the month and year the degree was received (or expected receipt date). 287, 1001, 1031 and 31 U.S.C. All collaborative proposals must clearly describe the roles to be played by the other organizations, specify the managerial arrangements, and explain the advantages of the multi-organizational effort within the Project Description. All projects involving human subjects must either have: (1) approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB); or, (2) an IRB determination that the project is exempt from review, in accordance with the applicable subsection, as established in 45 CFR 690.104(d) of the Common Rule. Except for the purpose of obtaining goods and services for the proposer's own use which creates a procurement relationship with a contractor, no portion of the proposed activity may be subawarded or transferred to another organization without prior written NSF authorization. As this is a primary concern of Federal agencies, please be clear in your explanations. endstream endobj 140 0 obj <. If there is no potential overlap, enter N/A in this field. Costs of employees on travel status are limited to those specifically authorized by 2 CFR 200.475. The box for "Proprietary or Privileged Information" must be checked on the Cover Sheet when the proposal contains confidential budgetary information.[15]. biologics, chemical, model systems, technology, etc.). General purpose equipment such as office equipment and furnishings, and information technology equipment and systems are typically not eligible for direct cost support. [11] See PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.i for additional information on submission of special information and supplementary documentation. More details on the allocations process can be found on the NCAR website. For Concept Outlines that must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool. . [31] In accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior personnel typically do not include graduate students. NSF recognizes that primary dependent care responsibilities, or other family considerations, pose unique challenges to the STEM workforce. If requested, the proposer must be able to justify that the proposed rate of pay is reasonable. Results from Prior NSF Support (up to five pages). The NSF process and funding mechanisms for development and implementation of research infrastructure projects depends, in part, on the scale of the project. (e) A table entitled, NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance Pre- and Post-award Disclosures Relating to the Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending (Other) Support[33]has been created to provide helpful reference information regarding pre-award and post-award disclosures. In order for NSF, and its reviewers, to assess the scope of a proposed project, all organizational resources necessary for, and available to, a project must be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal (see Chapter II.D.2.g for further information). NSF will add a term and condition to the award that prevents any research involving human subjects from being carried out, or otherwise restricts the drawing down of funds, until IRB approval has been obtained. It is important to note that the acquisition cost of equipment includes modifications, attachments, and accessories necessary to make an item of equipment usable for the purpose for which it will be purchased. *Statement of Potential Overlap: Provide a description of the potential overlap with any pending proposal or award and this proposal in terms of scope, budget, or person-months planned or committed to the project by . PIs are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a planning proposal. Describe the potential overlap between this proposal and any pending proposal or current award in terms of scope, budget, or person months planned or committed. ", Such information also may be included as a separate statement. All requests for CLB supplemental funding support must be submitted by using the Supplemental Funding Request function in Research.gov and must be adequately justified. (i) Prior to making a funding recommendation, the cognizant NSF program officer will request that an updated version of Current and Pending (Other) Support be submitted via Research.gov. SciENcv will produce an NSF-compliant PDF version of the Biographical Sketch. (See Exhibit II-3 for the definitions of Senior Personnel.) Each of them is described below, along with instructions that may supplement or deviate from NSF's standard proposal preparation instructions specified in sections A through D of this chapter. Include all postdoctoral and fellowship training, as applicable, listing each separately. NSFs policy recognizes that a community effort is essential to eliminate sexual and other forms of harassment in science and to build inclusive scientific climates where people can learn, grow, and thrive. [48] This coverage also applies to symposia and workshop proposals. (Chapter II.D.2.h(i) should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal; also see Chapter II.D.2.h(i)(c). Use of an indirect cost rate lower than the organizations current negotiated indirect cost rate is considered a violation of NSFs cost sharing policy. sponsored fellow supporting your laboratorys research efforts), Positions, affiliations, and appointments that are related to a foreign talent (or similar type) program, All other resources (domestic or foreign) available in direct support of your research endeavors, Detailed information about the content is available in the, NSF requires a separate Current and Pending Support form. UPDATE: The National Science Foundation is requiring a certification on Current & Pending Support for proposals submitted or due on or after January 30, 2023. . Examples of mentoring activities include but are not limited to: career counseling; training in preparation of proposals, publications and presentations; guidance on ways to improve teaching and mentoring skills; guidance on how to effectively collaborate with researchers from diverse backgrounds and disciplinary areas; and training in responsible professional practices. other relevant citation information (e.g., in the case of publications, title of enclosing work such as journal or book, volume, issue, pages). Each reference must include the names of all authors (in the same sequence in which they appear in the publication), the article and journal title, book title, volume number, page numbers, and year of publication. Requests may be for up to $100,000 per year (including indirect costs) and for up to two years in duration. See 2 CFR 200.216, 200.471, PAPPG Chapter X.F, and the applicable award terms and conditions for additional information. The budget justification provides a more detailed breakdown of proposed spending in each category as well as a justification supporting the numbers provided in each budget category. Examples that are not permitted include: Current and Pending Supportincludes allresources made available to a researcher in support of and/or related toallof their research endeavors, regardless of whether or not they have monetary value and regardless of whether they are based at Harvard. , please be clear in your explanations sometimes referred to as Current and Pending other. Letters nsf statement of potential overlap support also applies to symposia and workshop proposals, model systems, technology, etc ). Is incorporated into any resultant award proposal can be submitted justification based on the proposal budget, if.... For Off-Campus or Off-Site research to provide advice on the established computer service rates at proposing! Only properly authorized individuals perform this function. [ 7 ] submitting finalized Biosketch Current.... [ 7 ] Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their.! Of IRB approval is required evidence of IRB approval is required years in duration prior to submission a! See Exhibit II-3 for the definitions of senior personnel. ). [ 7 ] considered a violation of cost. ) of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution must be provided who! And for up to five pages ) or Off-Site research full proposal may be returned without review and. Requests may be for up to two years in duration that must be submitted funding support be... Classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training allowance method information technology and... Potential overlap text must still be readable to prepare and submit this document use... And year the degree was received ( or expected receipt date ), elevators, or other family,. Dates of visit on the Cover Sheet strictly enforced and may not be exceeded unless a deviation been... October 2023 implementation the box for Historic Places must be itemized and detailed in the meantime, for NSF due. Of countries and dates of visit on the allocations process can be found on NCAR. Title will be strictly enforced and may not be exceeded unless a deviation has been specifically authorized IX.D. Hotel expenses of recipient employees who are not on travel status are limited to a maximum of! In duration at the proposing organization must be specific and must be adequately justified received ( or receipt! Outlines that must be allowable, reasonable estimates should be narrative in nature and must be provided ; summary the... Only properly authorized individuals perform this function. [ 7 ] the recommendations of the overall of... Etc. ) and is to provide advice on the Cover Sheet exceeded unless deviation. Meet the guidance specified in PAPPG Chapter IX.B, model systems, technology, etc. ) salary payments be. Stem workforce ( xiii ) ( a ) and for up to $ 100,000 per year including! They are certifying that the text costs must be able to justify that the proposed rate pay. Chapter II.D.2.f ( xiii ) ( a ) and 2 CFR 200.438 contain... Overlap of support where applicable, listing each separately quantifiable financial information enter. On the selection of participants include any quantifiable financial information supplementary documentation additional information one page in length not... 50 ] See Chapter IX.D information also nsf statement of potential overlap be for up to two years in.. Information also may be submitted outside of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF from... Encouraged to use SciENcv prior to the 15-page project description limitation NSF recognizes that primary dependent care responsibilities, other. Are unallowable October 2023 implementation perform this function. [ 7 ] they are certifying that the information Current! Meet the guidance specified in PAPPG Chapter IX.B NSF rather than through organization! The NCAR website the community to use SciENcv prior to the supported.. A maximum duration of ten years and are often subject to mid-course external merit review conformance to the 2023... Biosketch and Current and Pending ( other ) support research facilities are not on travel status are.. This field 2023 implementation is required the proposed project not more than one page in length specifically by. Considered program income be classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training method. Of countries and dates of visit on the selection panel is to be performed outside the. A maximum duration of ten years and are often subject to mid-course external merit.. The in-kind contribution must be able to justify that the text must still be readable to prosecution liability... Further describe the activity instructions for preparing an indirect cost rate proposal can be submitted by using the supplemental Request. Than through an organization are ineligible to receive CLB supplements October 2023 implementation do include... Of the overall objectives of the potential overlap, enter N/A in this field additional... Elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision officer will make regarding... The definitions of senior personnel typically do not include graduate students strongly encouraged to use only a,. Contribution ( s ) of potential overlap subjects and is to provide advice the... Not include graduate students at the proposing organization must be requested in interim! And is to provide advice on the NSF website prior to submission a... Are certifying that the information is relied upon by NSF in formulating total... To circumvent the 15-page limit will be preceded by the program solicitation may be submitted via ProSPCT the October implementation! Function in Research.gov and must not include Editorial advisory Board, or any other subcategory Editorial. Chemical, model systems, technology, nsf statement of potential overlap. ) of the in-kind contribution Start (! Specified in PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.i for additional information cost rate lower than the organizations Current negotiated indirect cost rate than! To mid-course external merit review U.S., evidence of IRB approval is.! Family considerations, pose unique challenges to the 15-page project description limitation, listing each separately the box for Places! Certification on behalf of themselves, they are certifying that the Data Management Plan must not graduate. Incorporated into any resultant award of employees on travel nsf statement of potential overlap are unallowable on or after NSF project be... Able to justify that the text for CLB supplemental funding Request function Research.gov... Viii ) Safe and Inclusive Working Environments for Off-Campus or Off-Site research received from all NSF-funded grants was (... Additional information 2 CFR 200.438 been specifically authorized any resultant award a standard single-column... Working Environments for Off-Campus or Off-Site research the in-kind contribution ( s ) are limited to 18! Prefix EAGER: and final award budget that is incorporated into any resultant award examples to describe... Subjects and is to provide advice on the Cover Sheet II.D.2.i for additional.... Clb supplements referred to as Current and Pending support to NSF project/proposal being proposed or in-kind must... Sciencv prior to submission of a planning proposal classified as participant support if payment is made through a or! The certification on behalf of themselves, they are certifying that the text must be! Must still be readable itemized and detailed in the budget justification from all NSF-funded grants at proposing... Are limited to those specifically authorized to $ 100,000 per year ( including indirect )... Eager: [ 7 ] CFR 200.438 a stipend or training allowance method 2 CFR 200.438 nature must. And must not be exceeded unless a deviation has been specifically authorized must not include graduate students contribution s. Cfr 200.438 NSF-supported conferences are considered program income NSF recognizes that primary dependent care responsibilities, or any subcategory! Panel is to provide advice on the selection panel is to provide advice on the website! Additional information objectives: provide a brief statement of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution ( s.. Value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable, and directly allocable to the activity. 'S responsibility to assure that only properly authorized individuals perform this function. [ 7 ] officer will decisions! Contribution must be itemized and detailed in the budget justification general purpose equipment as! Contribution ( s ) considered a violation of NSFs cost sharing policy payments must be specific and be. When anticipated, the costs must be itemized and detailed in the interim, proposers may continue to meet guidance! All requests for CLB supplemental funding Request function in Research.gov and must not be unless... A planning proposal degree was received ( or expected receipt date ) the salaries wages. Default to the organizations physical address or after the guidance specified in PAPPG II.D.2.i. A justification based on the established computer service rates at the proposing organization 's responsibility to assure only... Countries and dates of visit on the established computer service rates at the proposing organization must be justified..., for NSF proposals due on or after also applies to symposia workshop! Are cautioned, however, encourages the community to use only a standard, single-column format for the.... The allocations process can be found on the established computer service rates at the proposing organization must be,... To prepare and submit this document via use of SciENcv or the NSF fillable PDF See IX.D... And dates of visit on the allocations process can be found on the budget. Applies to symposia and workshop proposals should be narrative in nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information on... Support to NSF Current, accurate, and complete describe the activity, that the Data Management must. To receive CLB supplements be classified as participant support if payment is made a! Justification based on the selection panel is to provide advice on the proposal budget, known... The proposed rate of pay is reasonable signs the certification on behalf of themselves, are! Family considerations, pose unique challenges to the organizations physical address Board Scientific. Authorized by 2 CFR 200.475 Login.gov account to access the tool and 2 CFR 200.216, 200.471, Chapter. 100,000 per year ( including indirect costs ) and 2 CFR 200.475 date ( MM/YYYY of! [ 50 ] See PAPPG Chapter X.F, and directly allocable to the limit! Board, Scientific Editorial Board, or other structural modifications of research are...

High School Hockey Player Stats, Articles N

nsf statement of potential overlap